Journal
COGENT ENGINEERING
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2023.2220483
Keywords
Agro-based waste ash; material characterization; calcined ash; uncalcined ash; GGBS; alkali-activation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Researchers conducted a comparative study on calcined and uncalcined agro-based waste ash in combination with granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in the alkali activation process. The study found that the use of calcined agro-based waste ash with GGBS yielded better results compared to uncalcined ash with GGBS.
A lot of energy is released during the cement manufacturing process, and a large amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) is discharged into the environment. Presently, researchers are focusing on reducing CO2 emissions by researching sustainable alternatives to traditional Portland cement-based materials. A comparative study on the material characterization of both calcined agro-based waste ash (calcined ash) and uncalcined agro-based waste ash (uncalcined ash) and its utilization as a binder along with granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in the alkali activation process is carried out in this paper. The study regarding calcined and uncalcined ash would help in better understanding the variation in the properties of the material and its behavior during the alkali activation process. The tests conducted on both calcined and uncalcined ash along with GGBS include specific gravity, X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, reaction degree, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis, particle size distribution, and the Puntke test for understanding its microstructural characteristics. Later, alkali-activated mortars are prepared using 30% weight of agro-based waste ash (both calcined and uncalcined) and 70% weight of GGBS. A comparison of the compressive strength of alkali-activated mortars prepared using calcined and uncalcined ash was studied, which showed a promising increase in the strength by 11.02% of mortar prepared using calcined ash (23.46 MPa) for 28 days when compared to mortar prepared using uncalcined ash (21.13 MPa). The major finding from this study indicates that calcined agro-based ash with GGBS shows better results compared to uncalcined agro-based ash with GGBS.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available