4.0 Article

Automatic diagnosis and classification of breast surgical samples with dynamic full-field OCT and machine learning

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.3.034504

Keywords

label-free histopathology; dynamic optical coherence tomography; metabolic imaging; machine learning; automated diagnosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Machine learning is employed to interpret D-FF-OCT images of breast surgical specimens, achieving a high accuracy rate above 88% at the image level and above 96% at the specimen level. This demonstrates the potential of D-FF-OCT coupled with machine learning to provide a rapid and accurate histopathology diagnosis.
Purpose: The adoption of emerging imaging technologies in the medical community is often hampered when they provide a new unfamiliar contrast that requires experience to be interpreted. Dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography (D-FF-OCT) microscopy is such an emerging technique. It provides fast, high-resolution images of excised tissues with a contrast comparable to H&E histology but without any tissue preparation and alteration. Approach: We designed and compared two machine learning approaches to support interpretation of D-FF-OCT images of breast surgical specimens and thus provide tools to facilitate medical adoption. We conducted a pilot study on 51 breast lumpectomy and mastectomy surgical specimens and more than 1000 individual 1.3 x 1.3 mm(2) images and compared with standard H&E histology diagnosis. Results: Using our automatic diagnosis algorithms, we obtained an accuracy above 88% at the image level (1.3 x 1.3 mm(2)) and above 96% at the specimen level (above cm(2)). Conclusions: Altogether, these results demonstrate the high potential of D-FF-OCT coupled to machine learning to provide a rapid, automatic, and accurate histopathology diagnosis with minimal sample alteration. (c) The Authors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available