4.5 Article

Trajectories of psychological distress over multiple COVID-19 lockdowns in Australia

Journal

SSM-POPULATION HEALTH
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101315

Keywords

Depression; Anxiety; Mental health; Trajectories; COVID-19; Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the trajectories of psychological distress during multiple lockdowns in five Australian states from May 2020 to December 2021. The research finds that the prevalence of psychological distress is higher during longer lockdowns, and tends to stabilize or decrease after ten consecutive weeks. Psychological distress rapidly subsided after lockdown restrictions were lifted but did not return to pre-lockdown levels within four weeks.
The impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic, including the indirect effect of policy responses, on psychological distress has been the subject of much research. However, there has been little consideration of how the preva-lence of psychological distress changed with the duration and repetition of lockdowns, or the rate of resolution of psychological distress once lockdowns ended. This study describes the trajectories of psychological distress over multiple lockdowns during the first two years of the pandemic across five Australian states for the period May 2020 to December 2021 and examines whether psychological distress trajectories varied as a function of time spent in lockdown, or time since lockdown ended.A total of N = 574,306 Australian adults completed Facebook surveys over 611 days (on average 940 par-ticipants per day). Trajectories of psychological distress (depression and anxiety) were regressed on lockdown duration and time since lockdown ended. Random effects reflecting the duration of each lockdown were included to account for varying effects on psychological distress associated with lockdown length.The prevalence of psychological distress was higher during periods of lockdown, more so for longer lockdowns relative to shorter lockdowns. Psychological distress increased rapidly over the first ten weeks of lockdowns spanning at least twelve weeks, though less rapidly for short lockdowns of three weeks or less. Psychological distress levels tended to stabilise, or even decrease, after ten consecutive weeks of lockdown. After lockdown restrictions were lifted, psychological distress rapidly subsided but did not return to pre-lockdown levels within four weeks, although continued to decline afterwards.In Australia short lockdowns of pre-announced durations were associated with slower rises in psychological distress. Lockdowns may have left some temporary residual population effect, but we cannot discern whether this reflects longer term trends in increasing psychological distress. However, the findings do re-emphasise the resilience of individuals to major life stressors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available