4.6 Article

Does the selection of virtual reality video matter? A laboratory experimental study of the influences of arousal

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 152-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.12.002

Keywords

Virtual reality video stimuli; SOR; Arousal; Flow experience; Satisfaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the effects of virtual reality video stimulation on user flow experience and subsequent satisfaction using the SOR paradigm. The results showed that self-reported arousal had a significant impact on enjoyment, time distortion, and focused attention. Respiration rate also influenced enjoyment and time distortion. User satisfaction was influenced by enjoyment and control, and enjoyment partially mediated the effects of arousal and respiration rate on satisfaction.
Despite the increasing number of studies on virtual tourism, there is currently little knowledge regarding the significance of the selection of appropriate virtual reality video (e.g., content stimulus) to marketing. This study explored how virtual reality video stimulation (arousal) elicited user flow experience and subsequent satisfaction using the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) paradigm. Analysis of the data revealed that self-reported arousal had a statistically significant impact on enjoyment, time distortion, and focused attention. Similar effects on enjoyment and time distortion were found by respiration rate. The results also demonstrated that user satisfaction was influenced by enjoyment and control. The PLS-SEM analysis further demonstrated that enjoyment partially mediated the effects of self-reported arousal and respiration rate on satisfaction. According to multigroup analysis, self-reported arousal (heart rate) exhibited a greater influence on enjoyment (time distortion) across two groups (weak versus strong stimulation). Theoretical and practical implications of these findings were discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available