4.5 Article

A 16-channel combined loop-dipole transceiver array for 7 Tesla body MRI

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages 884-894

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26153

Keywords

loop-dipole coil; dipole antenna; 7T body coil; body MRI at 7T; prostate MRI; parallel transmit

Funding

  1. NCI [R01 CA155268]
  2. WM Keck Foundation
  3. NIH [S10 RR026783]
  4. NIBIB [P41 EB015894]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo develop a 16-channel transceive body imaging array at 7.0T with improved transmit, receive, and specific absorption rate (SAR) performance by combining both loop and dipole elements and using their respective and complementary near and far field characteristics. MethodsA 16-channel radiofrequency (RF) coil array consisting of eight loop-dipole blocks (16LD) was designed and constructed. Transmit and receive performance was quantitatively investigated in phantom and human model simulations, and experiments on five healthy volunteers inside the prostate. Comparisons were made with 16-channel microstrip line (16ML) and 10-channel fractionated dipole antenna (10DA) arrays. The 16LD was used to acquire anatomic and functional images of the prostate, kidneys, and heart. ResultsThe 16LD provided>14% improvements in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), peak transmit, and SAR efficiencies over the 16ML and 10DA in simulations inside the prostate. Experimentally, the 16LD had>20% higher SNR and transmit efficiency compared with other arrays, and achieved up to 51.8% higher peak compared with 10DA. ConclusionCombining loop and dipole elements provided a body imaging array with high channel count and density while limiting inter-element coupling. The 16LD improved both near and far-field performance compared with existing 7.0T body arrays and provided high-quality MRI of the prostate kidneys and heart. Magn Reson Med 77:884-894, 2017. (c) 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available