3.8 Article

Who will excel in advanced endoscopy? A study assessing the criteria and perceptions of experts with regard to selection of ERCP and EUS trainees

Journal

ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages E268-E275

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-2017-3827

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify the selection criteria for ERCP/EUS trainees and investigate the satisfaction of the application process. The results showed that personal attributes, such as honesty, team player skills, and self-awareness, were highly valued by the training program directors/experts. However, there is room for improvement in the current application process, as the satisfaction level was moderate.
Background and study aims Training program directors (TPDs) and experts play a crucial role in selecting ERCP/ EUS trainees and determining the workforce in endoscopy. Additionally, prospective trainees should know what TPDs/ experts expect from them. Nonetheless, the criteria and perceptions used in this selection have not been clarified. The aim of this study was to identify TPD/expert values/beliefs regarding personal attributes needed for selecting trainees that can excel and those which may lead to disqualification; compare perspectives between TPDs/experts and trainees regarding the selection process and critical trainee characteristics; and investigate the general approach and satisfaction regarding current application process for ERCP/ EUS training. Methods We conducted a web-based survey to collect general opinion and data regarding the application process and trainee selection and disqualification from training. European TPDs/experts and trainees were invited to participate. Results Thirty-six TPDs/ experts and 25 trainees from 18 countries responded. The application process is mainly driven by individual request (86.1%). Almost half of TPDs/experts felt only moderately (38.9%) to slightly (8.3%) satisfied with the current application process. TPDs/experts value a diversity of trainee characteristics, but mainly traits such as honesty, being a team player, and self-awareness (72.2% each). Technical skills ranked seventh as considered extremely important. Disregard for patient welfare and lack of work ethic were the most common reasons for disqualification. TPDs/experts and trainees agreed in most questions. Conclusions This survey outlines trainee selection criteria for ERCP/EUS training. Non-technical skills are the most valued by TPDs/experts. While knowledge and technical expertise are clearly important, understanding that professional attitudes are highly regarded may help direct the application process more effectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available