4.5 Article

In Vivo Detection of 2-Hydroxyglutarate in Brain Tumors by Optimized Point-Resolved Spectroscopy (PRESS) at 7T

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages 936-944

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26190

Keywords

2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG); H-1 MRS; 7T, PRESS (point-resolved spectroscopy); human brain tumors; gliomas; IDH (isocitrate dehydrogenase)

Funding

  1. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [RP140021-P04, RP130427]
  2. National Institutes of Health [CA184584]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To test the efficacy of 7T MRS for in vivo detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) in brain tumors. Methods: The subecho times of point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) were optimized at 7T with density-matrix simulations and phantom validation to improve the 2HG signal selectivity with respect to the neighboring resonances of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamate (Glu), and glutamine (Gln). MRS data were acquired from 12 subjects with gliomas in vivo and analyzed with LCModel using calculated basis spectra. Metabolite levels were quantified using unsuppressed short echo time (TE) water as a reference. Results: The PRESS TE was optimized as TE = 78 ms (TE1 = 58 ms and TE2 = 20 ms), at which the 2HG 2.25 ppm resonance appeared as a temporally maximum inverted narrow peak and the GABA, Glu, and Gln resonances between 2.2 and 2.5 ppm were all positive peaks. The PRESS TE = 78 ms method offered improved discrimination of 2HG from Glu, Gln, and GABA when compared with short-TE MRS. 2HG was detected in all patients enrolled in the study, the estimated 2HG concentrations ranging from 1.0 to 6.2mM, with percentage standard deviation of 2%-7%. Conclusion: Data indicate that the optimized MRS provides good selectivity of 2HG from other metabolite signals and may confer reliable in vivo detection of 2HG at relatively low concentrations. (C) 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available