4.5 Article

An improved non-Cartesian partially parallel imaging by exploiting artificial sparsity

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages 271-279

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26360

Keywords

fast imaging; non-Cartesian partially parallel imaging; GROWL; artificial sparsity; high-pass filter; total variation

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Funds of China [81101031, 51477167]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo improve the performance of non-Cartesian partially parallel imaging (PPI) by exploiting artificial sparsity, the generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) operator for wider band lines (GROWL) is taken as a specific example for explanation. TheoryThis work is based on the GRAPPA-like PPI having an improved performance when the to-be-reconstructed image is sparse in the image domain. MethodsA systematic scheme is proposed to artificially generate the sparse image for non-Cartesian trajectory. Using GROWL as a specific non-Cartesian PPI method, artificial sparsity-enhanced GROWL (ARTS-GROWL) is used to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed scheme. The ARTS-GROWL consists of three steps: 1) generating synthetic k-space data corresponding to an image with smaller support, that is, artificial sparsity; 2) applying GROWL to the synthetic k-space data from previous step; and 3) recovering the final image from the reconstruction with the processed data. ResultsFor simulation and in vivo data, the experiments demonstrate that the proposed ARTS-GROWL significantly reduces the reconstruction errors compared with the conventional GROWL technique for the tested acceleration factors. ConclusionTaking ARTS-GROWL, for instance, experimental results indicate that artificial sparsity improved the signal-to-noise ratio and normalized root-mean-square error of non-Cartesian PPI. Magn Reson Med 78:271-279, 2017. (c) 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available