4.5 Article

On the accuracy and precision of cardiac magnetic resonance T2 mapping: A high-resolution radial study using adiabatic T2 preparation at 3T

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 159-169

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26107

Keywords

T-2 mapping; signal-to-noise ratio; accuracy; precision; numerical simulation; systole; diastole; off-resonance; tissue characterization

Funding

  1. Zeno Karl Schindler Foundation
  2. Emma Muschamp Foundation
  3. Centre d'Imagerie BioMedicale (CIBM) of the University of Lausanne
  4. University Hospital of Lausanne
  5. University of Geneva
  6. University Hospital of Geneva
  7. Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne (EPFL)
  8. Leenaards Foundation
  9. Jeantet Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeThe goal of this study was to characterize the accuracy and precision of cardiac T-2 mapping as a function of different factors including low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), imaging in systole, and off-resonance frequencies. MethodsBloch equation and Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine the influence of SNR and the choice of T-2 preparation echo time (TET2prep) increments on the accuracy and precision of high-resolution radial cardiac T-2 mapping at 3.0T. Healthy volunteers were scanned to establish the difference in precision and inter- and intraobserver variability between T-2 mapping in diastole and systole, as well as the effect of SNR and off-resonance frequencies on the accuracy of T-2 maps. ResultsThe simulations demonstrated that a TET2prep increment of approximate to 0.75 times the T-2 value of interest optimally increases the precision of the T-2 fit. Systolic T-2 maps were found to have a higher precision (P=0.002), but similar inter- and intraobserver variability compared with diastolic T-2 maps, whereas off-resonance frequencies beyond100Hz cause a significant decrease in both accuracy and precision (P<0.05). ConclusionThis evaluation of the accuracy and precision of cardiac T-2 mapping characterizes the major vulnerabilities of the technique and will help guide protocol definition of studies that include T-2 mapping. Magn Reson Med 77:159-169, 2017. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available