4.3 Review

Improving programme-led and focused interventions for eating disorders: An experts' consensus statement-A UK perspective

Journal

EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 577-595

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/erv.2981

Keywords

access to care; brief therapy; eating disorders; guided self-help; low intensity; treatment gap

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In October 2022, a group of predominantly UK-based clinical and academic researchers, charity representatives, and people with lived experience convened to discuss ways to improve access to and efficacy of programme-led and focused interventions for eating disorders, in an attempt to bridge the demand-capacity gap.
ObjectiveEating disorders are associated with significant illness burden and costs, yet access to evidence-based care is limited. Greater use of programme-led and focused interventions that are less resource-intensive might be part of the solution to this demand-capacity mismatch. MethodIn October 2022, a group of predominantly UK-based clinical and academic researchers, charity representatives and people with lived experience convened to consider ways to improve access to, and efficacy of, programme-led and focused interventions for eating disorders in an attempt to bridge the demand-capacity gap. ResultsSeveral key recommendations were made across areas of research, policy, and practice. Of particular importance is the view that programme-led and focused interventions are suitable for a range of different eating disorder presentations across all ages, providing medical and psychiatric risk are closely monitored. The terminology used for these interventions should be carefully considered, so as not to imply that the treatment is suboptimal. ConclusionsProgramme-led and focused interventions are a viable option to close the demand-capacity gap for eating disorder treatment and are particularly needed for children and young people. Work is urgently needed across sectors to evaluate and implement such interventions as a clinical and research priority.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available