4.3 Review

A systematic review of photovoice research methods with people with intellectual disabilities

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jar.13106

Keywords

arts-based research; intellectual disabilities; participatory action research; photovoice; systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically reviewed the current state of photovoice research with people with intellectual disabilities and identified areas for further methodological consideration. The findings explored the extent to which photovoice supported the 'voice' and agency of participants, and whether it lived up to its promise as 'action' research. The study concluded that photovoice creates opportunities for self-representation and suggested further support for participants to engage in critical reflection and collaborate on tangible outcomes with researchers.
Background: Photovoice is an arts-based participatory action research methodology that is growing in popularity. Our aim was to systematically review photovoice research with people with intellectual disabilities to describe the current 'state of the art' and identify areas for further methodological consideration. Methods: We searched five databases using search terms relating to photovoice and intellectual disabilities. Thirty one studies met inclusion criteria. We used thematic analysis to identify common themes. Findings: The themes identified-adaptations to the photovoice method, collaboration, participation and power, impact and outcomes-explored how far the 'voice' and agency of participants with intellectual disabilities taking part in photovoice research were supported and whether photovoice lived up to its promise as 'action' research. Conclusion: Photovoice creates opportunities for self-representation of people with intellectual disabilities through photography. Participants could be further supported to engage with researchers in critical reflection on findings and collaborate on tangible outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available