Journal
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages 593-612Publisher
SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.17269/s41997-023-00745-w
Keywords
CLSA; Nutrition status; Aged; Social determinants of health; Frailty; Regression analysis
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study identified the determinants of a 3-year decline in nutrition risk for older adults stratified by risk status at baseline. Different factors were associated with the change in nutrition risk for those with no risk and those who were already at high risk, suggesting the need for targeted approaches in screening and treatment of nutrition risk in primary care.
ObjectivesNutrition risk is a key component of frailty and screening, and treatment of nutrition risk is part of frailty management. This study identified the determinants of a 3-year decline in nutrition risk (measured by SCREEN-8) for older adults stratified by risk status at baseline.MethodsSecondary data analysis of the comprehensive cohort sample of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) (n = 5031) with complete data for covariates at baseline and 3-year follow-up. Using a conceptual model to define covariates, determinants of a change in nutrition risk score as measured by SCREEN-8 (lower score indicates greater risk) were identified for those not at risk at baseline and those at high risk at baseline using multivariable regression.ResultsModels stratified by baseline nutrition risk were significant. Notable factors associated with a decrease in SCREEN-8 for those not at risk at baseline were mental health diagnoses (- 0.83; CI [- 1.44, -0.22]), living alone at follow-up (- 1.98; CI [- 3.40, -0.56]), and lack of dental care at both timepoints (- 0.91; CI [- 1.62, -0.20]) and at follow-up only (- 1.32; CI [- 2.45, -0.19]). For those at high nutrition risk at baseline, decline in activities of daily living (- 2.56; CI [- 4.36, -0.77]) and low chair-rise scores (- 1.98; CI [- 3.33, - 0.63]) were associated with lower SCREEN-8 scores at follow-up.ConclusionDeterminants of change in SCREEN-8 scores are different for those with no risk and those who are already at high risk, suggesting targeted approaches are needed for screening and treatment of nutrition risk in primary care.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available