4.3 Article

A qualitative process evaluation using the behaviour change wheel approach: Did a whole genome sequence report form (SRF) used to reduce nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 within UK hospitals operate as anticipated?

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12666

Keywords

behaviour change; behaviour change wheel; COVID-19; hospital; infection prevention and control; sequence report form

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a whole-genome sequence report form (SRF) in changing infection prevention and control (IPC) behaviors to reduce nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study used a three-staged design, including theorizing the content of the SRF using the behavior change wheel (BCW), conducting interviews to explore contextual accounts of using the SRF, and analyzing the support for the intervention. The results showed that the SRF could effectively change IPC behaviors; however, challenges in integrating it into routine practice were reported, highlighting the importance of local context.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of a whole-genome sequence report form (SRF) used to reduce nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 through changing infection prevention and control (IPC) behaviours within the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: We used a three-staged design. Firstly, we described and theorized the purported content of the SRF using the behaviour change wheel (BCW). Secondly, we used inductive thematic analysis of one-to-one interviews (n = 39) to explore contextual accounts of using the SRF. Thirdly, further deductive analysis gauged support for the intervention working as earlier anticipated.Results: It was possible to theorize the SRF using the BCW approach and visualize it within a simple logic model. Inductive thematic analyses identified the SRF's acceptability, ease of use and perceived effectiveness. However, major challenges to embedding it in routine practice during the unfolding COVID-19 crisis were reported. Notwithstanding this insight, deductive analysis showed support for the putative intervention functions 'Education', 'Persuasion' and 'Enablement'; behaviour change techniques '1.2 Problem solving', '2.6 Biofeedback', '2.7 Feedback on outcomes of behaviour' and '7.1 Prompts and cues'; and theoretical domains framework domains 'Knowledge' and 'Behavioural regulation'.Conclusions: Our process evaluation of the SRF, using the BCW approach to describe and theorize its content, provided granular support for the SRF working to change IPC behaviours as anticipated. However, our complementary inductive thematic analysis highlighted the importance of the local context in constraining its routine use. For SRFs to reach their full potential in reducing nosocomial infections, further implementation research is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available