4.2 Article

Motives for nonmedical use of prescription stimulants in community college students

Journal

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2023.2180997

Keywords

Community college students; motives; nonmedical drug use; stimulants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify common motives for nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUS) among community college students and examine behavioral and demographic correlates of certain motives. The results showed that the most common motive for NMUS among these students was to focus on studies or to improve academic performance, followed by the desire to have more energy. Females were more likely to report NMUS for weight loss, while males were more likely to report NMUS for experimental purposes. The motive to feel good or get high was associated with polysubstance use.
Objective: The present study identified common motives for nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUS) among community college (CC) students and examined behavioral and demographic correlates of certain motives. Participants: The survey was completed by 3,113 CC students (72.4% female; 81.7% White). Methods: Survey results from 10 CCs were evaluated. Results: NMUS was reported by 9% (n = 269) participants. The most common motive for NMUS was to focus on studies or to improve academic performance (67.5%) followed by to have more energy (52.4%). Females were more likely to report NMUS for weight loss, and males were more likely to report NMUS to experiment. The motive to feel good or get high was linked to polysubstance use. Conclusions: CC students report similar motives for NMUS to those commonly endorsed by 4-year university students. These findings may help identify CC students susceptible to risky substance use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available