4.3 Article

Unity or Anarchy? A Historical Search for the Psychological Consequences of Psychotrauma

Journal

REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 303-319

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10892680231153096

Keywords

PTSD; psychotrauma; history of PTSD; diagnostic models; DSM; heterogeneity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The field of traumatic stress is marked by controversy and lack of continuity. Throughout history, there have been disputes about the psychological consequences and causes of severe adverse events. A review of historical literature shows that psychotrauma has always been a subject of controversy, with significant heterogeneity in symptom expression and varying definitions of conditions. The causes of trauma have also been debated, such as biological, psychological, socio-economic, cultural, political, or legal factors. A more flexible diagnostic approach is proposed to account for the ongoing variation in symptomatology.
The field of traumatic stress is often referred to as being in a state of controversy and lack of continuity. Throughout history, disputes repeatedly centered on defining the psychological consequences of severe adverse events and on their causes. Even to this day this is current. To understand these controversies, an extensive historical literature review is presented of how mental consequences of trauma have been described in history, of the circumstances in which this took place, and of the disputes that have influenced the conceptualization of these mental responses. We found psychotrauma always being surrounded by controversy. Significant heterogeneity in symptom expression has been described over the centuries to this day. Some symptoms appeared steadily over many decades, but often each time period showed its own core symptoms. At syndrome level, we found an acute condition, one with longer duration, and a complex condition. Also here, definitions varied over the decades. Finally, causes have always been debated, such as biological, psychological, socio-economic, cultural, political, or legal. To better reflect the described ongoing variation in symptomatology, a more flexible diagnostic approach is proposed with a combination of both staging and subtyping that offers room for a more flexible, symptom-oriented, and personalized perspective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available