4.0 Article

Homocysteine exchange across skeletal muscle in patients with chronic kidney disease

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15573

Keywords

CKD; folate; homocysteine; methionine; muscle

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the exchange of homocysteine (Hcy) in the forearm in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and those undergoing hemodialysis (HD). The results showed that Hcy levels in the deep forearm vein were consistently higher than the arterial levels, indicating Hcy release from muscle. The release of Hcy from the forearm was similar among all groups, and folate was identified as a major determinant of Hcy release.
Sites and mechanisms regulating the supply of homocysteine (Hcy) to the circulation are unexplored in humans. We studied the exchange of Hcy across the forearm in CKD patients (n = 17, eGFR 20 +/- 2 ml/min), in hemodialysis (HD)-treated patients (n = 14) and controls (n = 9). Arterial Hcy was similar to 2.5 folds increased in CKD and HD patients (p < 0.05-0.03 vs. controls). Both in controls and in patients Hcy levels in the deep forearm vein were consistently greater (+similar to 7%, p < 0.05-0.01) than the corresponding arterial levels, indicating the occurrence of Hcy release from muscle. The release of Hcy from the forearm was similar among groups. In all groups arterial Hcy varied with its release from muscle (p < 0.03-0.02), suggesting that muscle plays an important role on plasma Hcy levels. Forearm Hcy release was inversely related to folate plasma level in all study groups but neither to vitamin B12 and IL-6 levels nor to muscle protein net balance. These data indicate that the release of Hcy from peripheral tissue metabolism plays a major role in influencing its Hcy plasma levels in humans and patients with CKD, and that folate is a major determinant of Hcy release.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available