4.7 Article

Information practices for improved sustainability assurance in Vietnamese shrimp aquaculture

Journal

JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES
Volume 100, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103015

Keywords

Food systems; Social practices; Informational governance; Certification; Sustainability; Vietnam

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the impact of private sustainability interventions on smallholder farmers' information practices in Vietnamese shrimp aquaculture. The findings reveal that the prescribed reporting methodologies do not align with the existing practices, undermining their effectiveness. The paper suggests that understanding information practices is crucial for redesigning interventions and improving shrimp sustainability.
This paper explores the performance and embeddedness of information practices performed by smallholder farmers in Vietnamese shrimp aquaculture in response to private sustainability interventions. Using a social practice intervention framework, we analyse how existing information practices embedded in the wider social lives of farmers are affected by the adoption of both analogue and digital reporting methodologies prescribed by the Aquaculture Stewardship Council and VerifiK8. Our results demonstrate how these reporting methodologies are not aligned to the performance and embeddedness of existing information practices, and how this misalignment has undermined their function and performance. The paper concludes that understanding information practices offers important insights for redesigning these reporting interventions and, in doing so, better support both the goals of farmers and the improvement of shrimp sustainability. These observations hold implications for improving the impact of informational interventions for not only shrimp production but smallholder production in a range of food sectors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available