4.5 Review

Non-coding RNA mediates endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis in heart disease

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16246

Keywords

Apoptosis; Endoplasmic reticulum stress; microRNA; Ischemia; reperfusion; Heart disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apoptosis is a complex and self-regulating cell death form that plays an important role in the decline of ventricular function and the development of heart diseases. Endoplasmic reticulum stress is crucial in inducing apoptosis. Non-coding RNAs have been shown to regulate endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced cardiomyocyte injury and apoptosis. This study mainly discusses the effects of miRNA and LncRNA on endoplasmic reticulum stress in various heart diseases, aiming to clarify their protective effects and potential therapeutic strategies for apoptosis.
Apoptosis is a complex and highly self-regulating form of cell death, which is an important cause of the continuous decline in ventricular function and is widely involved in the occurrence and development of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and myocarditis. Endoplasmic reticulum stress plays a crucial role in apoptosis-inducing. Accumulation of misfolded or unfolded proteins causes cells to undergo a stress response called unfolded protein response (UPR). UPR initially has a cardioprotective effect. Nevertheless, prolonged and severe ER stress will lead up to apoptosis of stressed cells. Non-coding RNA is a type of RNA that does not code proteins. An ever-increasing number of studies have shown that non-coding RNAs are involved in regulating endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced cardiomyocyte injury and apoptosis. In this study, the effects of miRNA and LncRNA on endoplasmic reticulum stress in various heart diseases were mainly discussed to clarify their protective effects and potential therapeutic strategies for apoptosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available