4.7 Article

Can government subsidies improve innovation performance? Evidence from Chinese listed companies*

Journal

ECONOMIC MODELLING
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106151

Keywords

Innovation performance; Government subsidies; Internal control

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of government subsidies on innovation performance in China. The findings reveal an inverted U-shaped relationship between subsidies and innovation performance, with internal control playing a significant moderating role. The relationship is more pronounced in high-quality innovative firms and in the manufacturing industry, while firm size and subsidy amounts also have moderating effects. Moreover, the continuity of government subsidies has a similar impact on innovation performance.
This study examined whether government subsidies improve innovation performance in China. Existing studies provide conflicting insights regarding the impact of government subsidies on innovation performance. Government subsidies have a crowding-out effect and a crowding-in effect on innovation performance through both complementary and substitution effect mechanisms. Using data from 2012 to 2019 in Chinese listed companies, we found an inverted U-relationship between subsidies and innovation performance and that internal control plays a significant moderating role between them. The inverted U-relationship is more significant in high-quality innovative firms and in manufacturing, but firm size and subsidy amounts have moderating effects. Furthermore, continuity of government subsidies also has the same impact on innovation performance. Our results indicate that Chinese government subsidies contribute to innovation performance, but the role is limited by the level of management and quality of innovation, the industry in which the firm operates, and the size and continuity of government subsidies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available