4.5 Article

Can internet concern about COVID-19 help predict stock markets: new evidence from high-concern and low-concern periods

Journal

APPLIED ECONOMICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2210820

Keywords

COVID-19; stock markets; internet concern; GARCH type models; high-concern and low-concern periods

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the predictive ability of Internet concern about COVID-19 on stock index returns using GARCH models. The results show that COVID-19's Internet concern has a negative impact on stock index returns during the overall and high-concern periods, while its influence is mixed during the low-concern period. Additionally, Internet concern about COVID-19 improves the prediction accuracy of stock index returns during the high-concern period, but loses its powerful predictive ability during the overall and low-concern periods.
The unprecedented outbreak of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in extreme volatility in stock markets. This study mainly examines the predictive ability of the Internet concern about COVID-19 on stock index returns, based on the framework of GARCH type models. Instead of using the whole sample period, we divide the Internet concern about COVID-19 into high-concern and low-concern periods by breakpoint test method and then examine its predictive ability for stock returns in different periods, respectively. Using stock indexes of 10 countries and abnormal Google search volume of 'coronavirus' as study samples, the results reveal that (1) the Internet concern about COVID-19 has a negative impact on the stock index returns in the whole and high-concern periods, while its influence in the low-concern period is mixed; (2) the Internet concern about COVID-19 improves the prediction accuracy of stock index returns in the high-concern period, while seems to lose its powerful predictive ability in the whole and low-concern periods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available