4.5 Article

The Effect of Asymmetric Heterocyclic Units on the Microstructure and the Improvement of Mechanical Properties of Three Rigid-Rod co-PI Fibers

Journal

MACROMOLECULAR MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING
Volume 301, Issue 7, Pages 853-863

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mame.201600113

Keywords

asymmetry; compressive strength; copolyimide fiber; tensile properties

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51573105]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering [sklpme 2014-2-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three kinds of rigid-rod copolyimide (co-PI) fibers are prepared by wet-spinning of their precursor poly(amic acid)s, which are copolymerized from 3,3,4,4-biphenyltetracarboxylic dianhydride (BPDA), p-phenylenediamine (PDA), and the third asymmetric heterocyclic diamines, including 2-(4-aminophenyl)-5-aminobenzoxazole (BOA), 2-(4-aminophenyl)-5-aminobenzimidazole (PABZ), and 2,5-bis(4-aminophenyl)-pyrimidine (PRM), respectively. The asymmetry is increasing in the order PRM < BOA approximate to PABZ. The introduction of asymmetric heterocyclic units results in mesomorphic order structure and decreases the size of microvoid of PI fiber, which apparently improves the toughness of PI fiber and shows positive effects on mechanical properties. The tensile strength and initial modulus of co-PI fibers are in the ranges of 2.6-3.2 GPa and 91.8-133.5 GPa, respectively. The lowest asymmetry leads to the highest lateral order, crystal orientation, and initial modulus of BPDA/PDA/PRM co-PI. Moreover, the introduction of asymmetric heterocyclic units can effectively improve compressive properties. BPDA/PDA/PABZ co-PI fiber shows the highest loop strength and recoil compressive strength due to hydrogen bonding interactions. The highest orientation leads to the lowest transverse strength of BPDA/PDA/PRM co-PI fibers, reducing the recoil compressive strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available