4.8 Article

Drivers of sustainable business model innovations. An upper echelon theory perspective

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122409

Keywords

Sustainable business model innovation; TMT diversity; Top management team; University-industry collaboration; Ambidextrous learning; Transformational leadership

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the factors that drive the adoption of sustainable business model innovations (SBMIs). It utilizes a mixed-method approach to identify the factors that have led firms to switch to sustainable business innovation. The study finds that ambidextrous learning in the top management team (TMT) is positively associated with the adoption of SBMIs. Additionally, TMT diversity and university-industry collaboration positively influence ambidextrous learning, but the impact of collaboration on this relationship is negative.
This study explores the factors that drive the adoption of sustainable business model innovations (SBMIs). In this mixed-method (qualitative and quantitative) study, we draw on upper echelon theory to identify the factors that have led firms to switch from conventional products and processes to sustainable business innovation. This study of senior managers uses qualitative data to understand the mechanisms adopted by top management to make the switch to SBMIs. Data was gathered from 285 middle managers to empirically validate the theoretical model. The study concludes that in the top management team (TMT), ambidextrous learning has a positive association with the firm's decision to adopt SBMIs. However, TMT diversity and university-industry collaboration are positively associated with ambidextrous learning by top management and, subsequently, the adoption of SBMIs. Our findings also suggest that transformational leadership positively moderates the association between TMT diversity and ambidextrous learning. However, the impact on the relationship between collaboration and ambidextrous learning is negative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available