4.7 Article

Public participation for a greener Europe: The potential of farmers in biodiversity monitoring

Journal

LAND USE POLICY
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106577

Keywords

Citizen science; Biodiversity monitoring; Agricultural land; Environmental NGOs; Shared problem-solving

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the potential of involving farmers in the governance, organization, and execution of biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes. Through an empirical analysis of biodiversity monitoring in the Netherlands, the article identifies practical barriers to farmer participation, examines the role of environmental NGOs, and assesses the impact of data collection on adaptive land management decisions for biodiversity. The study suggests that the governance of agri-environmental subsidy contracts with farmer collectives in the Netherlands could be utilized to incentivize biodiversity data collection and science-based land management decisions.
This article considers the potential of including farmers in the governance, organization and execution of biodiversity monitoring. More specifically, we consider the opportunities for farmer involvement in biodiversity data collection through an explorative empirical analysis of the governance of biodiversity monitoring activities in agricultural landscapes within the Netherlands. We identify practical obstacles to farmer participation, assess the role of environmental NGOs in this process, and consider the extent to which this data leads to increasingly adaptive land management decisions to promote biodiversity. The governance of agri-environmental subsidy contracts with farmer collectives in the Netherlands, we conclude, could be used as an important vehicle to incentivize both biodiversity data collection and science-based land management decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available