4.6 Article

Cross-Modal Facilitation of Episodic Memory by Sequential Action Execution

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/09567976231158292

Keywords

prior knowledge; motor actions; sequence learning; temporal memory; episodic memory; open data; open materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our behavior has a central role in real-world experiences, but it is unclear how engaging in a familiar sequence of actions influences memory for unrelated nonmotor information. In our study, we found that engaging in a predictable and well-learned action sequence enhances temporal order memory for novel items, but does not affect item memory. These findings suggest that familiar behaviors during novel learning scaffold within-event temporal memory.
Throughout our lives, the actions we produce are often highly familiar and repetitive (e.g., commuting to work). However, layered upon these routine actions are novel, episodic experiences. Substantial research has shown that prior knowledge can facilitate learning of conceptually related new information. But despite the central role our behavior plays in real-world experience, it remains unclear how engagement in a familiar sequence of actions influences memory for unrelated, nonmotor information coincident with those actions. To investigate this, we had healthy young adults encode novel items while simultaneously following a sequence of actions (key presses) that was either predictable and well-learned or random. Across three experiments (N = 80 each), we found that temporal order memory, but not item memory, was significantly enhanced for novel items encoded while participants executed predictable compared with random action sequences. These results suggest that engaging in familiar behaviors during novel learning scaffolds within-event temporal memory, an essential feature of episodic experiences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available