4.7 Article

Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of replika

Journal

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600

Keywords

Social chatbot; Relationship development; Attachment; Anthropomorphism; Authenticity; Replika

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes and tests a human-Artificial Intelligence (AI) relationship development model in the context of social chatbots. By combining existing human-computer interaction theoretical concepts with interpersonal relationship theories, the study advances an explanatory model of human - AI relationship development mechanism. AI Anthropomorphism and AI Authenticity are identified as antecedents, AI Social Interaction as a mediator, and Attachment to AI as an outcome, moderated by the AI usage motivations. The study provides meaningful implications for theory, managerial practice, society, and suggestions for chatbot designers and future research.
This mixed-method investigation proposes and empirically tests a human-Artificial Intelligence (AI) relationship development model in the context of social chatbots. Utilizing data from representative populations and employing method triangulation, the study uniquely combines existing human-computer interaction theoretical concepts (Computers are Social Actors, Perceived Social Presence, and Parasocial Interaction) with interpersonal relationship theories (Social Penetration and Attachment Theories) to advance an explanatory model of human - AI relationship development mechanism. We identify AI Anthropomorphism and AI Authenticity as antecedents, AI Social Interaction as a mediator, and Attachment to AI as an outcome of this process, moderated by the AI usage motivations. Meaningful theoretical, managerial, and societal implications, as well as suggestions for chatbot designers and future research are provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available