4.7 Article

Are government employees more or less likely to venture? Evidence from China

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113629

Keywords

Government employees; Entrepreneurial intentions; Entrepreneurial alertness; Life satisfaction; Institutional environment; Mixed-methods design

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the relationship between government employment and entrepreneurial intentions through the mechanisms of entrepreneurial alertness and life satisfaction. It also examines the moderating effects of tax burden and corruption. The findings show that government employment positively influences entrepreneurial intentions through entrepreneurial alertness, but negatively influences them through life satisfaction. Tax burden and corruption play different roles in moderating these effects, revealing a complex system of relationships.
Although many new ventures are created by government employees, these potential founders' entrepreneurial intentions are rarely studied. Building on the pull-push theory of entrepreneurship, this study elucidates the relationship between government employment and entrepreneurial intentions through two opposing mediation routes: entrepreneurial alertness and life satisfaction. We also analyze a potential moderating role of two institutional factors, tax burden and corruption. We employ a mixed-methods design. Empirical findings from four archival data sources reveal that government employment positively associates with entrepreneurial in-tentions through entrepreneurial alertness but negatively relates to entrepreneurial intentions through life satisfaction. These two competing mechanisms are also differentially moderated by tax burden and corruption, revealing a nuanced system of effects. We use qualitative interviews to validate the quantitative findings and investigate different facets of this phenomenon to enrich our understandings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available