4.7 Review

Valorization of lignin for renewable non-isocyanate polyurethanes: a state-of-the-art review

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100367

Keywords

Non-isocyanate polyurethane; Lignin functionalization; Biomass fractionation; Renewable materials; Content

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review focuses on utilizing functionalized lignin as a precursor for the production of eco-friendly and non-hazardous non-isocyanate polyurethanes (NIPUs) as alternatives to toxic diisocyanate-based PUs. It summarizes the chemical structure, fractionation processes, and functionalization strategies of lignin, as well as the current trends in synthesizing NIPUs using lignin derivatives. The potential applications of lignin-based NIPUs and the challenges in commercialization are also highlighted in this review.
Due to the merits of abundant and unique structural features, the valorization of lignin, the second largest naturally abundant polymer, for the preparation of valuable biomaterials, has become a research hotpot. This review emphasized on the opportunities and challenges of using the functionalized lignin as precursor for the production of eco-friendly and non-hazardous non-isocyanate polyurethanes (NIPUs) as alternates to the conventional toxic diisocyanate-based PUs. The chemical structure, the fractionation processes, and the functionalization strategies of lignin (e.g. alkoxylation, phenolation, etherification, urethanation, hydroxymethylation, amination, nitrification, and sulfomethylation) are summarized, fol-lowed by shedding light on the current trends in synthesizing the NIPUs using lignin derivatives as the starting molecules. Potential directions for the application of the lignin-based NIPUs and the challenges in commercialization are also highlighted in this review.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available