Development and psychometric properties of the social adjustment scale for youth cancer survivors in South Korea

Objective: We developed a new scale-the Social Adjustment Scale for Youth Cancer Survivors-and examined its psychometric properties.Methods: In the scale's development stage, preliminary items were constructed based on the results of a concept analysis of the hybrid model, literature review, and interviews. These items were then reviewed through content validity and cognitive interviews. In the validation stage, 136 survivors were recruited from two children's cancer centers in Seoul, South Korea. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify a set of constructs, and validity and reliability were tested.Results: Starting with 70 items constructed through literature review and interviews with youth survivors, the final scale comprised 32 items. The exploratory factor analysis identified four domains-namely, role achievement in one's present position, harmony in relationships, disclosure and acceptance of cancer history, and preparation and expectation for future roles. Correlations with quality of life indicated good convergent validity (r 1/4 0.82, P < 0.001). The Cronbach's & alpha; of the overall scale was 0.95, indicating excellent internal consistency; and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94 (P < 0.001), suggesting high test-retest reliability.Conclusions: The Social Adjustment Scale for Youth Cancer Survivors exhibited acceptable psychometric properties in measuring the social adjustment of youth cancer survivors. It can be used to identify youths facing difficulty in adjusting to society after treatment and to investigate the effect of interventions implemented to promote social adjustment among youth cancer survivors. Future research is needed to examine the applicability of the scale in patients across diverse cultural backgrounds and healthcare systems.

Automated summary

In this study, a new scale called the Social Adjustment Scale for Youth Cancer Survivors was developed and its psychometric properties were examined. The preliminary items were constructed based on concept analysis, literature review, and interviews, and were then evaluated for content validity and cognitive interviews. The final scale consisted of 32 items and showed good convergent validity and reliability.