4.7 Article

Bibliometric Mapping of School Garden Studies: A Thematic Trends Analysis

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9030359

Keywords

public health; well-being; eating behavior; education sciences; pro-environmental behavior; pro-social behavior

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper analyzed the thematic trends in school garden studies over the past few decades using a relational bibliometric methodology. The results showed a significant amount of scientific research focused on school gardens. The study identified thematic trends, consolidated classic papers and introduced new authors and papers. These studies led to a broader discussion on the effects of school gardens beyond education, involving interdisciplinary research challenges across various fields.
This paper analyzes the thematic trends in school garden studies over the past few decades, using a relational bibliometric methodology on a corpus of 392 articles and review articles indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. The paper seeks to understand how researchers have studied the concept over the last few decades in various disciplines, spanning approximately eighty Web of Science categories. The results show that there is a critical mass of scientific research studying school gardens. The analysis shows the thematic trends in discussion journals, discussion terminology, and consolidates classic papers and some novel authors and papers. The studies and their theoretical trends lead to refocusing the analysis on the effects of school gardens beyond the educational, thanks to the contribution of authors from more than fifty countries engaged in the study of these activities. This work constitutes new challenges for this line of research, raising interdisciplinary research challenges between horticultural, environmental, technological, educational, social, food, nutritional, and health sciences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available