4.4 Article

Optimizing The Timing of Stereotactic Minimally Invasive Drainage for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Journal

NEUROLOGY AND THERAPY
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 919-930

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00465-w

Keywords

Stereotactic minimally invasive drainage; Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage; Surgery timing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study compared the outcomes of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients who underwent stereotactic drainage at conventional timing (within 12 hours of admission) and those who underwent the procedure at a customized surgical timing. The results showed that the customized timing group had better prognosis, higher hematoma clearance rate, and lower recurrent hemorrhage rate compared to the conventional timing group. Therefore, customized timing of stereotactic drainage may be a better option to reduce post-surgery complications and promote recovery.
IntroductionIntracerebral hemorrhage is a high-risk pathological event that is associated with formidable morality rates. Here, our objective was to perform a retrospective study to determine the best timing for drainage using physiological data on patients who received drainage at different timings.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed 198 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage who underwent stereotactic drainage at the conventional timing (surgery within 12 h of admission; control group) and 216 patients who underwent stereotactic drainage at a customized surgical timing (elective group). Follow-ups were performed at 3 and 6 months after surgery.ResultsThe clinical indicators, including prognosis, hematoma clearance, recurrent hemorrhage, intracerebral infection, pulmonary infection, deep venous thrombosis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, and matrix metallopeptidase 2 and 9 levels, were compared between the control and elective groups. Our data indicated that the elective group had significantly better prognosis compared to the control group (p = 0.021), with a higher rate of hematoma clearance (p = 0.004) and a lower rate of recurrent hemorrhage (p = 0.018). The total occurrence rate of post-surgery complications was also lower for the elective group (p = 0.026). NIHSS scores and serum MMP2/9 levels of the elective group were lower than those of the control group.ConclusionsCustomized timing of stereotactic drainage may be superior to conventional fixed timing (within 12 h post-hemorrhage) in reducing post-surgery complications and promoting recovery, which supports the potential use of customized timing of stereotactic minimally invasive drainage as a new convention in clinics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available