4.6 Article

Succinic Production from Source-Separated Kitchen Biowaste in a Biorefinery Concept: Focusing on Alternative Carbon Dioxide Source for Fermentation Processes

Journal

FERMENTATION-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fermentation9030259

Keywords

succinic acid; kitchen biowaste; organic fraction of household kitchen wastes; enzymatic hydrolysis; anaerobic digestion; carbon dioxide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a sustainable method for producing succinic acid from the organic fraction of household kitchen wastes. The use of enzymatic hydrolysis and A. succinogenes fermentation resulted in high sugar conversion and succinic acid yields. The study also demonstrated the successful conversion of the liquid fraction and residue of kitchen waste into biogas.
This study presents sustainable succinic acid production from the organic fraction of household kitchen wastes, i.e., the organic fraction of household kitchen waste (OFHKW), pretreated with enzymatic hydrolysis (100% cocktail dosage: 62.5% Cellic(R) CTec2, 31%% beta-Glucanase and 6.5% Cellic(R) HTec2, cellulase activity of 12.5 FPU/g-glucan). For fermentation, A. succinogenes was used, which consumes CO2 during the process. OFHKW at biomass loading > 20% (dry matter) resulted in a final concentration of fermentable sugars 81-85 g/L and can be treated as a promising feedstock for succinic production. Obtained results state that simultaneous addition of gaseous CO2 and MgCO3 (>20 g/dm(3)) resulted in the highest sugar conversion (79-81%) and succinic yields (74-75%). Additionally, CH4 content in biogas, used as a CO2 source, increased by 21-22% and reached 91-92% vol. Liquid fraction of source-separated kitchen biowaste and the residue after succinic fermentation were successfully converted into biogas. Results obtained in this study clearly document the possibility of integrated valuable compounds (succinic acid) and energy (biogas) production from the organic fraction of household kitchen wastes (OFHKW).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available