4.7 Article

Antioxidant activity of C-Glycosidic ellagitannins from the seeds and peel of camu-camu (Myrciaria dubia)

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 76-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.01.024

Keywords

C-glycosidic ellagitannin; Myrciaria dubia; Antioxidant activity; Camu-camu; Seeds

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K12551] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

C-Glycosidic ellagitannins grandinin (1), vescalagin (2), castalagin (3), methylvescalagin (4), stachyurin (5), and casuarinin (6) were isolated from the 50% acetone extract of camu-camu (Myrciaria dubia) seeds and peel. These tannins exhibited antioxidant activities measured by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) assays, and the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay. In the DPPH and ABTS assays, stachyurin exhibited the strongest antioxidant activity among the tannins, and the activities were stronger for tannins containing two hexahydroxydiphenoyl (HHDP) groups and a galloyl group than for tannins containing a non-ahydroxyterphenoyl group and a HHDP group. The activity of vescalagin was stronger than that of castalagin, and a similar relationship was observed for stachyurin and casuarinin. Thus, the antioxidant activities of these tannins may depend on the conformation of the hydroxyl group at C-1 of the open ring n-glucose. However, in the ORAC assay, casuarinin exhibited the strongest activity, and the respective activities could not be explained by the structural rigidity or conformation of the C-1 hydroxyl group. The seeds and peel of camu-camu, waste products of juice production, were found to contain C-glycosidic ellagitannins with potent antioxidant activities, and thus, they could be a useful resource for functional foods and food additives. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available