4.7 Article

Characterization of lactobacilli strains derived from cocoa fermentation in the south of Bahia for the development of probiotic cultures

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 259-266

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.06.003

Keywords

Lactobacilli; Cocoa fermentation; Characterization; Antagonism; Probiotics

Funding

  1. MINCyT-CAPES [BR/red13/05, 407278/2013-3]
  2. Bolsa Pesquisador Visitante Especial - PVE - MEC/MCTI/CAPES/CNPq/FAPs/Linha 2 - Bolsa Pesquisador Visitante Especial PVE [71/2013]
  3. Proyecto CAI+D Convocatoria an Cultivos microbianos autoctonos para la production de alimentos funcionales para humanos y animales utilizando secado spray [501 201101 00136 LI]
  4. categoria Equipo de Reciente Formacion, ANPCyT Resolucion [N 214/14, PICT-2013-0260]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the last years, several factors have contributed to the development of probiotic cultures from locally sourced strains. In this paper, we aimed to characterize Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus fermentum isolates derived from Brazilian cocoa fermentation for the development of new probiotic cultures. Isolates diversity was studied by RAPD and strains were further tested in vitro for their probiotic potential. Physiological traits such as heat tolerance, hydrophobicity, resistance to simulated gastrointestinal digestion and antibiotic susceptibility were studied. Besides, activity against food pathogens was tested through four different assays: deferred inhibition, co-aggregation, co-cultivation and antagonism of supernatants. Considering the resistance to simulated gastrointestinal digestion and the results from the antimicrobial and co-aggregation tests, L. plantarum 286 showed the most promising results, followed by L. plantarum 289, for further studies for their application as probiotics. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available