4.7 Article

A combined hurdle approach of slightly acidic electrolyzed water simultaneous with ultrasound to inactivate Bacillus cereus on potato

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 615-621

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.04.016

Keywords

Hurdle technology; Ultrasound; Slightly acidic electrolyzed water; Predictive model; Bacillus cereus; Potato

Funding

  1. High Value-added Food Technology Development Program, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, South Korea [314059-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Slightly acid electrolyzed water (SAcEW) and ultrasound (US) treatment have emerged as an environmental-friendly antimicrobial agent. However, SAcEW treatment alone shows low antimicrobial efficiency. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a hurdle approach that combined SAcEW and US to improve the antimicrobial effect against Bacillus cereus as well as inhibition of the growth on potato. US treatment under different conditions of dip times, acoustic energy densities (AED) and temperatures were conducted to obtain the optimal condition. Our findings demonstrate that 3 min of US with 400 W/L of AED at 40 degrees C treatment (US + 40 degrees C) significantly (p < 0.05) reduced B. cereus population by 2.3 +/- 0.1 log CFU/g with minimal change in the color of potato. In addition, 3 min of SAcEW (pH, 5.3-5.5; ORP, 958-981 mV; ACC, 28-30 mg/L) simultaneous with US+40 C treatment (SAcEW + US+40 degrees C) an approximately 3.0 log CFU/g reduction in B. cereus. Furthermore, SAcEW + US+40 degrees C treatment efficiently extended lag time of B. cereus by 0.2-10.5 hrs, reduced that of specific growth rate by 0.01-0.23 log CFU/h during storage at different temperatures from 5 to 35 degrees C. Therefore, this combined hurdle technology is capable of improving microbial safety of potato during storage and distribution. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available