4.7 Article

Comparative extraction processes, volatile compounds analysis and antioxidant activities of essential oils from Cirsium japonicum Fisch ex DC and Cirsium setosum (Willd.) M.Bieb

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 595-605

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.01.017

Keywords

Cirsium japonicum Fisch ex DC; Cirsium setosum (Willd.) M.Bieb.; Essential oils; Extraction processes; Antioxidant activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparison of extraction processes, volatile compounds analysis and antioxidant activities of essential oils (EOs) from Cirsium japonicum Fisch. ex DC and Cirsium setosum (Willd.) M.Bieb., two morphological and aroma similar species, were investigated. In total, 143 different constituents were assigned, which were further grouped into hydrocarbons, alcohols, esters, ketones, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, aromatics. Results of HS-SPME revealed that the similar grassy and fruity aromas of C. japonicum and C setosum derived from Hexyl alcohol, 1-Pentanol, 6,10,14-trimethyl-2-Pentadecanone, etc. In addition, HD was employed to gather EOs. Compared with the Standard Method, yields of EOs by the Optimum Method from C japonicum and C. setosum increased by 86.58 +/- 4.28% and 102.60 +/- 1.57%, respectively. Chemical analysis by GC MS revealed that the high temperature of the optimal condition decreased the types of EOs compounds or changed some compounds into other hot-steady compounds. Furthermore, antioxidant activity analysis (DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP assays) indicated that EOs extracting by the optimized condition of both C japonicum and C setosum possessed much higher FRAP value and potent ABTS radical scavenging ability. Therefore, the study could pave the way for the extraction of EOs and further developing of C japonicum and C setosum resources. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available