4.7 Article

Porous Organic Cage as a Sulfur Host for Upgrading Capacity and Longevity of Li-S Batteries

Journal

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 7910-7919

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.3c01099

Keywords

porous organic cages; large cavities; O-heteroatoms; Li; S batteries; host materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Suffering from the severe shuttle effect, it is a great challenge to construct highperformance lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries with high capacity and prolonged cycling life. Developing porous host materials for sulfur loading remains a tendency. This study explores the potential of porous organic cages (POCs) as host materials for loading high sulfur content in Li-S batteries, showing improved electrochemical performances and stability.
Suffering from the severe shuttle effect, constructing highperformance lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries with high capacity and prolonged cycling life remains a great challenge. Developing porous host materials for sulfur loading remains a tendency. Porous organic cages (POCs), as a kind of porous material, exhibit potential in energy storage and conversion because of their inherent cavities and plentiful active sites. Herein, two POC materials of CPOC301 and HPOC-401 with large octahedral cavities and abundant N and O heteroatoms were explored as host materials for loading a high sulfur content of 84 wt % in Li-S batteries. The resulting CPOC-301-S and HPOC-401-S cathodes exhibit improved electrochemical performances with high specific capacity (1302 and 1109 mA h g-1 at 0.05 C, respectively) and excellent cycling reversibility and stability (a low average capacity fading rate of 0.015% for 2500 cycles at 5 C for CPOC-301-S). Moreover, the interconversion of keto-enamine in CPOC-301 could accelerate the redox kinetics. This work provides the blueprint for POC families applied as promising host materials for advanced Li-S batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available