4.5 Article

Chromatic aberration and decay resistance performance of bamboo and bamboo scrimber decayed by white-rot and brown-rot fungi

Journal

WOOD MATERIAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2023.2193822

Keywords

Phyllostachys heterocycla; Wood rot fungi; Charring; Mass loss; Chromatic aberration; SEM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four types of bamboo materials were tested for decay resistance against four types of wood rot fungi. The dark color bamboo scrimber showed the best decay resistance, while moso bamboo had the worst decay resistance. Moso bamboo and natural color bamboo scrimber exhibited significant color changes and decreased brightness after fungal infection.
Moso bamboo (MB), carbonized moso bamboo (CMB), natural color bamboo scrimber (NBS), and dark color bamboo scrimber (DBS) were subjected to Poria vaporaria (PP), Gloeophyllum trabeum (GT), Coriolus versicolor (CV) and Trametes versicolor (TV) in laboratory experiments. The differences in surface chromaticity and mass loss of four samples before and after decay were compared. The results showed that the decay resistance of DBS after four wood rot fungal infections reached grade I, and DBS had the best decay resistance among the four samples. MB had the worst decay resistance among the four samples. After being infected by four kinds of wood rot fungi, the color of MB and NBS changed significantly, as the brightness decreased significantly. The red-green axis color index and yellow-blue axis color index of MB and NBS infected by PP, GT, CV, and TV showed significant increases compared to those of untreated samples. The chroma values of MB and NBS increased significantly after the decay test. SEM analysis showed that after the brown-rot test, the hyphae of GT entered the MB vessels and the parenchyma cells through the pits in the vessel, causing the cell structure to be destroyed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available