4.5 Article

'Development and psychometric evaluation of the safety feeling scale in adult patients at hospital: Exploratory sequential mixed method'

Journal

NURSING OPEN
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1850

Keywords

feeling; hospitalization; patient; patient safety

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to develop and assess the psychometric properties of the Safety Feeling Scale (SFS) in adult patients during hospital stays. Through two phases of scale development and evaluation, the study identified 12 items across four factors, explaining 51% of the total variance of the scale. The scale demonstrated good properties in terms of reliability, feasibility, and responsiveness.
Aim and Objectives: This study aimed to develop and examine psychometric properties of the safety feeling scale (SFS) in adult patients to assess their sense of safety during a hospital stay.Design: Mixed methods design. A SQUIRE checklist was used.Methods: This is a study with two phases of scale development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the scale. In the first phase, the concept of 'safety feeling' was analysed using a hybrid model. Thus, a systematic review and then a qualitative study with hospitalized patients (n = 31) were conducted by conventional content analysis. In the psychometric phase, factorial validity, reliability, feasibility, and responsiveness of the scale were evaluated by different tests in various samples.Results: After integrating the results of the systematic review and qualitative study, a scale item pool with 84 items was developed. In the psychometric phase, 12 items with four factors were specified; 'effective care,' 'confidence in the healthcare team,' 'emotional enrichment' and 'hygienic facilities,' explaining 51% of the total variance of the scale. They were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency and stability of the scale were satisfactory. Feasibility and responsiveness were also acceptable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available