4.4 Review

Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic vs. laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score ≥7: A meta-analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN SURGERY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1138974

Keywords

robotic nephrectomy; laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; renal tumors; RENAL nephrometry score; meta-analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) vs. laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for complex renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score >= 7. The study found no significant differences in estimated blood loss, hospital stay, positive surgical margin, major postoperative complications, and transfusion between the two groups. However, RPN showed better outcomes in the operating time, postoperative renal function, warm ischemia time, conversion rate to radical nephrectomy, and intraoperative complications.
IntroductionTo compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) vs. laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for complex renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score >= 7. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for studies from 2000 to 2020 to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of RPN and LPN in patients with a RENAL nephrometry score >= 7. We used RevMan 5.2 to pool the data. ResultsSeven studies were acquired in our study. No significant differences were found in the estimated blood loss (WMD: 34.49; 95% CI: -75.16-144.14; p = 0.54), hospital stay (WMD: -0.59; 95% CI: -1.24-0.06; p = 0.07), positive surgical margin (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.65-1.11; p = 0.23), major postoperative complications (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.52-1.54; p = 0.69) and transfusion (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48-1.08; p = 0.11) between the groups. RPN showed better outcomes in the operating time (WMD: -22.45; 95% CI: -35.06 to -9.85; p = 0.0005), postoperative renal function (WMD: 3.32; 95% CI: 0.73-5.91; p = 0.01), warm ischemia time (WMD: -6.96; 95% CI: -7.30--6.62; p < 0.0001), conversion rate to radical nephrectomy (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66; p = 0.002) and intraoperative complications (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28-0.97; p = 0.04). DiscussionRPN is a safe and effective alternative to LPNs for or the treatment of complex renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score >= 7 with a shorter warm ischemic time and better postoperative renal function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available