Development of the clinical reasoning competency scale for nurses

BackgroundClinical reasoning is emphasized as an important component of nursing education, since nurses' lack of clinical reasoning leads to incorrect clinical decision-making. Therefore, a tool for measuring clinical reasoning competency needs to be developed.MethodsThis methodological study was conducted to develop the Clinical Reasoning Competency Scale (CRCS) and examine its psychometric properties. The attributes and preliminary items of the CRCS were developed based on a systematic literature review and in-depth interviews. The validity and reliability of the scale were evaluated among nurses.ResultsThe exploratory factor analysis was conducted for the construct validation. The total explained variance of the CRCS was 52.62%. The CRCS consists of 8 items for plan setting, 11 items for intervention strategy regulation, and 3 items for self-instruction. The Cronbach's alpha of the CRCS was 0.92. Criterion validity was verified with the Nurse Clinical Reasoning Competence (NCRC). The correlation between the total NCRC and CRCS scores was 0.78, all of which were significant correlations.ConclusionThe CRCS is expected to provide raw scientific and empirical data for various intervention programs to develop and improve nurses' clinical reasoning competency.

Automated summary

This study developed the Clinical Reasoning Competency Scale (CRCS) and evaluated its psychometric properties. The attributes and items of the CRCS were based on a literature review and interviews. Exploratory factor analysis showed the CRCS had an explained variance of 52.62%. The scale consists of items for plan setting, intervention strategy regulation, and self-instruction. The CRCS had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.92 and significant correlations with the Nurse Clinical Reasoning Competence (NCRC).