4.5 Article

Sick Leave Due to Ear Diagnoses, a Nationwide Representative Registry of Mexico

Journal

HEALTHCARE
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11081112

Keywords

vestibular; hearing loss; sick leave; work absenteeism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrospectively analyzed the frequency of sick leave due to ear-related diagnoses in Mexico between 2018 and 2019. The most common ear-related diagnoses were vestibular disorders, with Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo being the most frequent. In total, 22,053 sick leave certificates were provided to 18,033 workers during the two years.
Sickness absence from work is a measure of both poor health and social functioning. In order to assess the frequency of sick leave due to ear-related diagnoses, we performed a retrospective analysis on the registry of paid sick leave certificates supplied by the main social security institution in Mexico during the years 2018 and 2019, just prior to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We observed that, in the two years, 22,053 sick leave certificates due to ear-related diagnoses were provided to 18,033 workers. The most frequent ear-related diagnoses were those of vestibular disorders (94.64%); among them, the most common diagnosis was Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (75.16%), followed by Labrynthitis and Meniere's disease (circa 8% each). A total of 4.63% of the diagnoses were related to external and middle ear disorders, and 0.71% were mainly related to hearing. Consistently, the highest cumulative days of sick leave required were given for the group of diagnoses related to vestibular disorders; although the less frequent diagnoses required the highest cumulative days per case (e.g., ototoxicity). During 2018 and 2019, the most frequent diagnoses of ear-related sick leave were due to vestibular diagnoses (particularly Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available