Comparison of Standard and New Iron Status Biomarkers: A Prospective Cohort Study in Sepsis Patients

Both iron deficiency (ID) and iron overload can have negative effects on the risk and course of infection. Therefore, the ability to accurately assess iron status in these patients is of the utmost importance. Systemic inflammation in sepsis patients affects the results of standard iron biomarkers and makes accurate diagnosis of ID problematic. The aim of our study was to analyze the association between widely available standard iron biomarkers and selected new iron biomarkers in various iron status subgroups among sepsis patients. Consecutive patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock and procalcitonin concentration > 0.5 ng/mL were enrolled. The following iron biomarkers were determined: iron, ferritin, transferrin, transferrin saturation, reticulocyte (Ret) number and percentage, Ret hemoglobin equivalent, Ret fluorescence subpopulations, and hepcidin concentration. The study group comprised 90 study subjects. There were 42 (47%) patients with normal iron status, 6 (6%) with ID without anemia, and 42 (47%) with ID anemia. No meaningful correlation exists between standard and new iron biomarkers in various iron status subgroups among sepsis patients. Therefore, standard iron biomarkers cannot be used to diagnose ID in this cohort.

Automated summary

This study analyzed the association between widely available standard iron biomarkers and selected new iron biomarkers in sepsis patients. The results showed that there is no meaningful correlation between standard and new iron biomarkers in various iron status subgroups.