4.7 Article

Response to Drought Stress of In Vitro and In Vivo Propagated Physalis peruviana L. Plants Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi

Journal

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13020472

Keywords

Physalis peruviana L; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; antioxidant protection

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigated the response of golden berry plants to drought stress and found that plants inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and propagated in vitro showed higher resistance to drought compared to plants developed from seeds. The findings are important for optimizing the cultivation of golden berry in adverse environments and understanding plant responses to drought conditions.
Physalis peruviana L. is one of the most favorable tropical fruit due to its fast growth and nutritional properties. The current research outlined the response to drought stress of golden berry plants inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Claroideoglomus claroideum and propagated in vitro as well as from seeds. The implementation of mycorrhizal symbiosis was determined by root colonization, glomalin content, and alkaline and acid phosphatases in roots and soil. The plant protection was assured by enzyme and non-enzyme antioxidants. The adapted in vitro propagated plants demonstrated higher resistance to drought than plants developed from seeds indicated by increased growth parameters (shoot, root biomass, fruit number), plastid pigment content, antioxidant activity, and less enhance mentofoxidative markers levels in water-deficient conditions. The findings in the present research are relevant to obtain the optimal mycorrhizal association and type of propagation in an adverse environment for golden berry development and will lead to the establishment of a database and model of varied plant responses to stressful conditions such as drought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available