4.5 Article

Personal, Interpersonal, and Sociocultural Factors of Condom Use in Rural Indigenous Nahuas Adolescents in Mexico

Journal

CHILDREN-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children10060921

Keywords

adolescent; indigenous culture; condoms; sexual behavior

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this research was to determine the predictors of condom use among rural Indigenous adolescents. The predictor variables were selected from Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory and Leininger's Transcultural Theory. The study found that age at menarche/first ejaculation, attitude toward condom use, ethnic identity, and ability to negotiate condom use were significant predictors of condom use among the participants. This research provides a foundation for incorporating the cultural values of Indigenous adolescents into sexual health promotion interventions.
The goal of this research was to determine the personal, interpersonal, and sociocultural predictors of condom use among rural Indigenous adolescents. Predictor variables were selected from Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory and Leininger's Transcultural Theory. The sample consisted of 419 Nahuas adolescents randomly selected from the total number of neighborhood blocks in a rural community in Puebla, Mexico. The instruments had acceptable psychometric characteristics (Cronbach alpha and validity scores). Multiple linear regression models were used. Results: 56.8% of participants were female, and 50.40% were students. Mean age was M = 17.5 (SD = 0.97), and the majority (63%) identified as Catholic. Age at menarche/first ejaculation (& beta; = -1.2, p = 0.038), attitude toward condom use (& beta; = 0.13, p < 0.001), ethnic identity (& beta; = 0.21, p < 0.001), and ability to negotiate condom use (& beta; = 0.13, p = 0.003) predicted (R-2 = 22.3) condom use. This study provided a basis for integration of the cultural values of Indigenous adolescents within interventions for sexual health promotion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available