4.5 Article

Experience with the mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus in Pediatric Liver Graft Recipients

Journal

CHILDREN-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children10020367

Keywords

pediatric liver transplantation; graft dysfunction; immunosuppressive therapy; renal impairment; malignancy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are limited data on the use of MTOR inhibitors in children after liver transplantation. Our analysis of 37 patients receiving Everolimus showed a patient survival rate of 97% and a graft survival rate of 84%. Everolimus appears to be a viable treatment option in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Introduction: Immunosuppression after pediatric liver transplantation remains a major challenge. MTOR inhibitors provide a promising therapeutic approach in combination with reduced CNI after transplantation. However, there are still few data regarding their use in children. Patients: We analyzed 37 patients with a median age of 10 years, who received Everolimus for one or more of the following indications: I = chronic graft dysfunction (n = 22); II = progressive renal impairment (n = 5); III = non-tolerable side effects with previous immunosuppressive medication (n = 6); and IV = malignancies (n = 10). The median follow-up time was 36 months. Results: Patient survival was 97%, and graft survival 84%, respectively. Stabilization of graft function was observed in 59% in subgroup 1, with 18.2% ultimately requiring retransplantation. No patient in subgroup IV developed recurrence of his primary tumor or PTLD by the endpoint of the study. Side effects were observed in 67.5% of the study patients, with infections being the most frequent (n = 20; 54.1%). There were no relevant effects on growth and development. Conclusion: Everolimus seems to be a treatment option in selected pediatric liver graft recipients for whom other regimens are not suitable. Overall, the efficacy was good and the side effect profile appeared to be acceptable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available