4.5 Article

A DIDE-FPP Composite Algorithm for Accurate Tunnel Fire Location

Journal

PHOTONICS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/photonics10030272

Keywords

FBG; spatial positioning; peak finding algorithm; peak ratio; success rate

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A DIDE-FPP composite algorithm is proposed to improve the spatial location accuracy of tunnel fires. The algorithm combines the distributed individuals differential evolution (DIDE) algorithm and the four-point positioning (FPP) method. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has advantages in peak finding and solving multimodal optimization problems compared to existing methods. The spatial positioning accuracy of a tunnel fire warning system using this method can reach the centimeter level.
We propose a DIDE-FPP composite algorithm to improve the spatial location accuracy of tunnel fires based on the distributed individuals differential evolution (DIDE) algorithm and the four-point positioning (FPP) method. Using the DIDE algorithm to solve the multimodal optimization problems in tunnel fire location can locate more peaks and improve peak finding, and the FPP method is used to process the peak points located using the DIDE and achieve the spatial location which cannot be achieved otherwise using the DIDE method only. We used 20 multimodal test functions to evaluate the performance of the DIDE-FPP algorithm in peak finding and solving MMOPs. Through experimental comparisons with 13 other existing advanced methods, the comprehensive performance of the proposed DIDE-FPP composite algorithm shows advantages to some extents. Additionally, the combined value of PR (peak ratio) and SR (success rate) on up to 20 experimental functions is relatively high. The spatial positioning accuracy of a tunnel fire warning system using this positioning method can reach the centimeter level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available