4.7 Article

Hydrostatic, strike-slip and normal stress true triaxial hydrofracturing testing of Blanco Mera Granite: breakdown pressure and tensile strength assessment

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40948-023-00564-w

Keywords

Hydraulic fracturing; Breakdown pressure; Tensile strength; Fracture orientation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed a versatile testing device for hydraulic fracturing experiments under true triaxial conditions. The device is based on a stiff biaxial frame and can accommodate large rock samples. Using a low-permeability rock, we conducted tests under different pressures and verified the applicability of fracture mechanics models. The presence of heterogeneities and defects in the rock matrix may affect the interpretation of hydrofracturing tests.
We have designed and built a versatile testing device to perform hydraulic fracturing experiments under true triaxial conditions. The device, based on a stiff biaxial frame that can be installed in a servocontrolled press, can accommodate cube rock samples of up to 150 mm-edge. Using a low-permeability rock known as Blanco Mera granite, we have performed a series of tests across a range of confining pressures including hydrostatic, normal, and strike-slip regimes. We have verified the applicability of two simple fracture mechanics-based models for the interpretation of experimental results, and we have determined the value of tensile strength of the rock from the injection curves recorded. The orientation of the hydraulically-triggered fractures with respect to the applied stress has also been analyzed. Although the models proposed by Rummel and Abou-Sayed provided reasonably satisfactory results, especially for hydrostatic and strike-slip tests, the presence of heterogeneities and defects in the rock matrix may have a strong influence on the fracture behavior and, therefore, affect the interpretation of hydrofracturing tests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available