4.6 Review

Understanding the adsorption of iron oxide nanomaterials in magnetite and bimetallic form for the removal of arsenic from water

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1104320

Keywords

arsenic removal; adsorption; magnetite nanoparticles; isotherms; bimetallic iron oxide nanoparticles; regenration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arsenic contamination is a global concern due to its serious health hazards caused by prolonged exposure to drinking water. Iron-oxide nanomaterials have gained attention as cost-effective and efficient adsorbents for arsenic removal. However, most research is based on laboratory findings and cannot be replicated in natural water environments. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of arsenic removal using different iron-oxide nanomaterials and insights into future research directions.
Arsenic decontamination is a major worldwide concern as prolonged exposure to arsenic (> 10 mu g L-1) through drinking water causes serious health hazards in human beings. The selection of significant, cost-effective, and affordable processes for arsenic removal is the need of the hour. For the last decades, iron-oxide nanomaterials (either in the magnetite or bimetallic form) based adsorptive process gained attention owing to their high arsenic removal efficiency and high regenerative capacity as well as low yield of harmful by-products. In the current state-of-the-art, a comprehensive literature review was conducted focused on the applicability of iron-based nanomaterials for arsenic removal by considering three main factors: (a) compilation of arsenic removal efficiency, (b) identifying factors that are majorly affecting the process of arsenic adsorption and needs further investigation, and (c) regeneration capacity of adsorbents without affecting the removal process. The results revealed that magnetite and bimetallic nanomaterials are more effective for removing Arsenic (III) and Arsenic (V). Further, magnetite-based nanomaterials could be used up to five to six reuse cycles, whereas this value varied from three to six reuse cycles for bimetallic ones. However, most of the literature was based on laboratory findings using decided protocols and sophisticated instruments. It cannot be replicated under natural aquatic settings in the occurrence of organic contents, fluctuating pH and temperature, and interfering compounds. The primary rationale behind this study is to provide a comparative picture of arsenic removal through different iron-oxide nanomaterials (last twelve yearsof published literature) and insights into future research directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available