4.6 Article

Quantum Leaps in Human Biocultural Evolution and the Relationship to Cranial Capacity

Journal

LIFE-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life13041030

Keywords

biocultural evolution; cranial capacity; cognitive performance; stone tools; symbolic behavior; intentional evolution; posthumanism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The understanding of the evolution of the genus Homo requires considering both biology and culture as interacting inheritance systems shaping human nature. This study demonstrates the parallel progression of brain-size increase and cultural development using cranial capacity data and archaeological records, indicating several quantum leaps in biocultural evolution. The leaps include the use of sophisticated tools and fire, the development of symbolism, and the current challenge of intentional evolution. Extrapolation of the model into the future suggests that the persistence of humans as biological entities is not guaranteed.
The evolution of the genus Homo can only be understood by considering both of the inheritance systems that interact to shape human nature: biology and culture. While growing intellectual abilities are a key factor of human evolution, they are rarely contrasted with cultural progress. Cranial capacity data of 193 hominin fossils from the last seven million years and artefacts of increasing number and complexity in the archaeological record are used to demonstrate the concordant progression of brain-size increase and cultural development, starting approximately two million years ago. Our biocultural evolution shows a number of quantum leaps along the time axis applying to both domains. At first, humans left the canonical evolutionary pathway, which pertains to all other organisms, by enhancing their fitness using sophisticated tools and fire; secondly, they turned into a symbolic species; and finally, humanity now faces a new challenge: intentional evolution. Chronologically, these quantum leaps correspond to cranial capacity data used here as a proxy for cognitive performance. This contribution tries to demonstrate this parallel development and argues for a simple and generalized model of human biocultural evolution. An extrapolation of the model into the future shows that humans, as biological entities, will not necessarily persist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available