4.6 Review

Effectiveness of real-time classroom interactive competition on academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1310

Keywords

Mobile learning; Gamification; Kahoot!; Smartphone; Students; Classroom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, various tools have been used in education to encourage active participation and interaction between students and teachers through personal response systems. This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of real-time classroom interactive competition (RCIC) in improving academic performance. The study found that RCIC interventions were effective in enhancing academic performance across different educational levels and tools. Short-term and long-term interventions both led to significant improvements. Therefore, RCIC interventions appear to be an effective strategy for improving academic performance.
In recent years, different tools have been introduced into the educational landscape to promote active participation and interaction between students and teachers through personal response systems. The evolution of this methodology has allowed students to participate in real-time by answering questions posed. Previous reviews on the effectiveness of real-time classroom interactive competition (RCIC) on academic performance have been performed; however, this research was based only on Kahoot, without considering other RCIC tools or programs. In addition, the RCIC effectiveness at different educational levels and its effect according to the duration of the intervention has not been meta-analytically analyzed until to date. The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the RCIC effectiveness in improving academic performance. A search focused on studies from the educational field published from 2010 until September 2022 was performed. Experimental studies with objective and valid data (scores based on tests or exams) were included. From a total of 397 studies considered potentially eligible, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. The sample was n = 1,877 for the experimental group and n = 1,765 for the control group with an academic improvement in favor to experimental group (MD 7.34; CI [5.31-9.43]; p < 0.001). There was also significant improvement in academic performance when analyzing different educational levels and different tools. In addition, both short-term interventions (two weeks or less in duration) and long-term (from two weeks to one year in duration) were effective. Therefore, RCIC interventions seem to be an effective strategy to improve academic performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available